Prompt Engineering through Structured Instructions and Advanced Techniques

1. Introduction

Language models (LLMs) are powerful tools for a variety of tasks, but their effectiveness is highly dependent on the design of prompts. This article examines advanced techniques in prompt engineering, focusing on the impact of instruction order, the “Ask Before Answer” technique, and the “Chain of Thoughts” (CoT) method, etc. By optimizing these factors, we can significantly enhance the accuracy and reliability of LLM outputs.

2. The Importance of Instruction Order

Instruction order plays a crucial role in prompt engineering. Altering the sequence of instructions or actions can drastically change the outcome produced by the LLM. For instance, when we previously placed an instruction about not considering “semi-exposed surfaces” as the eleventh step, the LLM would still process these surfaces as it followed each step sequentially, reaching the exclusion instruction too late to apply it effectively. However, when this instruction was moved to precede all other steps, the LLM correctly disregarded “semi-exposed” surfaces. This demonstrates the necessity of positioning general concepts or definitions above the specific step-by-step instructions, ensuring they are applied throughout the process.

Example:

3. The “Ask Before Answer” Technique

The “Ask Before Answer” technique is particularly effective when optimizing prompts to reduce the occurrence of hallucinations. By prompting the LLM to seek clarification before resolving a task, we can preempt misunderstandings that might lead to incorrect answers.

Example Prompt:

Result:

When applying this technique, we ask the LLM to identify specific areas where it may be uncertain or confused in resolving a test case. By doing so, we can pinpoint where hallucinations occur, understand why the LLM struggles with certain choices, and refine the prompt in those areas where the model tends to get confused. This method is highly effective in improving the quality of the instructions provided in the prompt.

4. The Chain of Thoughts (CoT) Technique

Result without CoT:

One of the most critical steps in creating an effective prompt with complex instructions is the use of the Chain of Thoughts (CoT) technique. By including phrases like “You think step by step,” “Take your time,” or “Explain every step,” the LLM is given time to reflect and process all input data. With the last  This approach significantly improves the results, making them more logical and coherent. But you need to be careful when using “Explain every step”. Because often the LLM can find the most likely things that are correct, but it can not always explain why it chooses this, which often leads to hallucination

Result with CoT:

5. Meta-Prompting: An Advanced Strategy in Prompt Engineering

Meta-prompting is an advanced technique in prompt engineering that goes beyond merely guiding a language model (LLM) through a task. It involves crafting prompts that instruct the model on how to think or approach a problem before the primary task begins. This strategic layer of prompting enhances the LLM’s ability to navigate complex instructions by embedding a meta-level understanding of the task at hand. For example, instead of directly asking the LLM to solve a problem, a meta-prompt might instruct the model to first assess whether it fully understands the task, identify potential ambiguities, and request clarification if necessary. This proactive approach reduces the likelihood of errors and hallucinations by encouraging the model to consider its own limitations and seek additional information before proceeding.

When applied in Claude LLM, meta-prompting proved to be more effective than in GPT models. It significantly improved test case outcomes by making instructions simpler and clearer for the model to understand. Claude’s advanced processing capabilities allowed it to better interpret and act on the meta-prompts, leading to more accurate and consistent results. By guiding the LLM to reflect and seek clarity at key stages, meta-prompting not only enhanced the accuracy of the results but also optimized structure and the clarity of instructions, making them more intuitive and easier for the model to follow.

Example how meta-prompting optimized Claude outputs:

However, in our specific case, meta-prompting did not lead to the exceptional results we had hoped for. While it is a valuable technique that has the potential to improve LLM performance, its effectiveness can vary depending on the complexity of the task and the model’s inherent capabilities. Despite this, meta-prompting remains a powerful tool in the prompt engineering toolkit, particularly for refining and simplifying instructions for better LLM comprehension.

6. Explanatory Instructions

One key insight in optimizing prompt engineering is the importance of providing explanations for why certain choices should be made. Adding reasoning behind instructions helps LLMs make better-informed decisions, thereby improving their overall performance.

For instance, consider the following instructions:

  • Worse: “If both HPL and TFL can be used, choose TFL.”
  • Better: “If both HPL and TFL can be used, choose TFL as the more cost-effective option.”

In the “better” example, the LLM is not only told which option to choose but also why that choice is preferable. This additional context helps the model understand the underlying logic and apply it more consistently across different scenarios. Conversely, the “worse” example simply dictates a choice without explanation, which may lead to less reliable or inconsistent outcomes.

Incorporating explanations within prompts also reduces the likelihood of errors or hallucinations by giving the LLM a clearer framework for decision-making. This approach enhances the model’s ability to follow complex instructions more accurately, resulting in better task execution and improved performance.

By emphasizing the “why” behind decisions, prompt engineers can create more robust prompts that align better with the intended goals, ultimately leading to more effective and reliable use of language models.

7. Simplify your instructions

When writing instructions for LLMs, it’s crucial to keep them clear and simple. If people find it hard to read and understand the instructions, the model will struggle even more. Use plain language and short sentences, as if you’re explaining things to a child. If the instructions are complex, break them into a few sentences to make them easier to follow.

For instance, consider the following instructions:

  • Worse: “If front materials are not specified or not matched with TFL surfaces, HPL, or A-Tech Surface, choose HPL as the default option.”
  • Better: “If fronts are not specified, default to HPL unless TFL or A-Tech Surface is mentioned.”

In the “better” example, the instructions are straightforward and easier to understand. This clarity helps the model grasp what’s needed more effectively and reduces the probability of hallucinations. The simpler the instructions, the more accurately and reliably the model will perform. Breaking instructions into a few shorter sentences can make them more digestible and prevent confusion.

8. Imagine You’re Training a Colleague

When crafting prompts, it’s essential to approach the task as if you are training a child or a new colleague at work to complete a specific task. To achieve this, you need to provide the individual with sufficient context and detailed, clear instructions. The prompt should include all necessary information to ensure precise task execution. This method helps to ensure that the instructions are comprehensive and easily understood, thereby improving the likelihood of successful task completion.

9. The Role in Prompting

An important aspect of creating effective prompts is assigning a specific role to the language model (LLM). This role definition helps limit the data the LLM will use to solve the task and sets the appropriate tone and format for the response. Role prompting can also enhance the LLM’s performance in various tasks, such as math or logic problems.

For example: “You are a Casework expert tasked with reviewing a specification and selecting the correct Series option that represents cabinet materials and thickness.”

  • Worse: “You are a Casework expert”
  • Better: “You are a Casework expert tasked with reviewing a specification and selecting the correct Series option that represents cabinet materials and thickness.”

This role-based approach provides the LLM with a clear context and specific guidelines, which positively influences the accuracy and relevance of the model’s responses.

10. Conclusion

In prompt engineering, the careful structuring of instructions, along with techniques like “Meta-prompting” and “Chain of Thoughts,” “Role Prompting”, “Ask Before Answer”, and others can dramatically enhance the performance of language models. These methods help in reducing hallucinations, improving clarity, and ensuring more accurate outcomes. Future research could explore further optimization strategies and their effects on various types of LLM tasks.

11. References

Prompt Engineering for ChatGPT: A Comprehensive Guide

The Prompt Report: A Systematic Survey of Prompting Techniques

Related articles

//Prompting

Minimizing Randomness in GPT Responses: A Guide to Using Seeds, Top_p, and Monitoring System Fingerprints

//Prompting

Experiments with different LMMs